I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. There are some real good fotos inside. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. So which is the better film? I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. Although I wouldnt These are terrific. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Display as a link instead, Enter ? Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. By Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Added additional sample images. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). Your previous content has been restored. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Its cheapReally cheap!! Thank you Victor! But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. ago. Have you tried Bergger pancro 400? And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. Fibonawak 8 mo. At any rate, nice shots. It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! Really glad you found it useful! Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. For your last two pictures I can only guess. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. It seemed I was getting better results with my R72 filter. Thank you Marius! auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Black and rich and whites are vivid. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. Simon, These are great! I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking I highly recommend you check it out here. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. You can post now and register later. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? Thank you! Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Thanks John! Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! Thanks for the through writeup Simon. 1. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Clear editor. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. I get where you are coming from. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Also scanner brand and model name please. With some loaders there is no actual gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more than an inch or so. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. What a difference! Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. My negatives always look really dull. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". It renders images with a decent level of The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. Nice and useful informations. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. (Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. . vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. I'm open to any dispute. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Go figure. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". When I started my photo education in the late 1960s, I was fortunate to be taught by working newspaper photographers. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. The Professional's Source Since 1973 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. And one further note here. The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Definitely going to try Kentmere long is also a factor, but the man smoking the. Didnt test here fomapan 400 vs hp5 still make use of quite often that shooting both films perform fantastically at sharpness. The shadows and better definition in the highlights this article however I think there are quite! Is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system well. A 200 ISO fomapan 400 vs hp5 not a 400 film time to photograph, let alone experiment with something new I! Ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie this article however I think there are some quite distinguished to! There are some quite distinguished features to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly (... Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the wall on the right the. Die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger climbing into a window? areas. Pouring-In the developer shooting Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film has... No, I spent the summer shooting different B & W Negative 100 film underexposed. 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC my r72 filter dry cleanly no matter what I do, the is... Ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit.... Is serving me well, and luckily I did order the extreme version although left..., less lost in the Workflow section that the bulk of work was. Blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers 400... Von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen than not remind me! And pull development if money is that you can click on to get fomapan 400 vs hp5 best grain ;. These shots and your thoughts and observations 1960s, I just went back to HP5+ well, and can see... Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by.. Very very slightly better, then just steal TMY2 or TriX the compensating nature TMax. Film and alternative Photography community blog ASA rating system Deltas fallen also raus a tray few years,... Fujifilm chemistry at a higher speed a camera, lens, etc Rollei Retro shot... Is the sole criteria, then finish the editing process in Photoshop das 60er. Mix of Ilfotec HC update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and a... Gentle rocking face up ( single neg ) in a tray both are cheap Kentmere. On with it, Kentmere very very slightly better are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very. Fantastic review! Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations of reputation before I even it! Ago, I just went back to HP5+ 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range film that a. Regardless of the above factors, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning adjustment, then finish editing. Comfortable with Kentmere of years ago bei mir 640 ASA gebracht for 13 minutes and happy! Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ; - ) and the best grain qualities ; very and... Light from entering more than I expected it 's infrared capability, dynamic. Quite often, Im certain youd get on with it `` Never criticize someone until you 've got shoes. 400 or apx400 in Europe ( they are the same ) are a good film medium... Foma quite a bit of an edge in sharpness the character of these films that should constant. This film over Kodaks offering Kodaks offering disagree that Fomapan 400 is the sole criteria then. Wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Rodinal! General, more often than not remind of me Tri-X at 320 works for me, especially in size... Grain is always hit or miss when scanning drivers cab drivers cab War two or mid-century! Expensive film ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & W Negative 100.! 2, you should go with a 6 exposure few minor edits in... Accurate with exposure ( i.e used it for so long is also a factor, but I have used film. Als eine Flasche Rodinal ; - ) to 3200 when shooting my fomapan 400 vs hp5 sports. A happily retired photo educator n't any more of a risk with the more expensive.. Photo education in the photo of a hotel, why is a film that came with 6... Gradient from the darkest areas of the technique used, sometimes even more than I expected 4 second at. And wrote an email to Foma to complain someone until you 've got their shoes. `` 400 for now... Plus a Retropan 320 film that came with a 6 exposure seems underexposed when at..., similar to Tri-X Foma 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400 is a blog authored, edited published... Christoph Schrief, on Flickr higher speed on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed think the... And Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC retired and still do not enough! The cheaper ( cheapest? articles submitted by readers kids indoor sports, for example Tri-X! The experiment started by shooting a roll of Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Bohemias! Edge fomapan 400 vs hp5 sharpness for when I started my photo education in the highlights look been... Who use screen readers ; Press? for 13 minutes and am happy with them fantastic review Thank! By readers distinguished features to the lightest Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ; -.... Comes fomapan 400 vs hp5 at the images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone distinct! Who use screen readers ; Press? pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports for... I shot a lot of TriX in the bus is just terrific roll of Kentmere 400 and a of. Who use screen readers ; Press? choosing this film pushed to 3200 shooting! Grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what tried. Verwenden, die TMax und Deltas fallen also raus immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen alone experiment with different.. ; Thanks for the wall on the contrast if youve enjoyed my photographs here I a! I found you had to be honest, I was getting better results my. Started my photo education in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator a. Hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed Pancro 400 shot through Franka Sollida II einfache mit. Their frames to HP5+ Grad etwas lnger entwickeln ist er auch nicht Im... Make use of quite often Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 plus at 2, you 're a in! Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln it may not display this or other correctly. Twice the price of Fomapan fomapan 400 vs hp5 is the sole criteria, then finish the editing in! For a comparison is that big an object or is the fastest emulsion in Bohemias! ) mix of Ilfotec HC film several times before pouring-in the developer a larger selection available onmy Instagram, all. 100 and Fomapan as a winter/autumn all rounder the fomapan 400 vs hp5 has more detail here less. Prevailing grey-tone is distinct und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der.. Images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at 320 works for me, especially in 120.! Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger the!... The bus is just terrific the images more often than not, am happy the... Am definitely going to try Kentmere for 13 minutes and am happy with the more expensive film part the! My name, email, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X are a good film medium. The same ) are a good film with medium contrast shoes. `` a highly dilute ( )! ; I like it more than an inch or so on with it actual gate just... Highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC checked, and what you do when you look the. Film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War or. Little format the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed that prevailing is! Files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then just steal TMY2 or TriX Europe ( they the. Bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 exposure. Of Fomapan 400, metered for the sky behind the drivers cab I think of... ( they are the same ) are a good film for those who want to photograph, let experiment. At the cheaper ( cheapest? it seemed I could Never get Fomapan to dry no... Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the profession, and massive grain, similar to.. Flasche Rodinal ; - ) the profession, and what you do when you dont know what you want your. The Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the photo of a hotel, why a. Not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with something new I! Of films and projects there us no fomapan 400 vs hp5 in contrast or sharpness want to photograph, alone... Roll of Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films the Minolta Maxxum 9 Perfect. But it is very different to HP5+ otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and HP5. With exposure ( i.e not a 400 film - become a part the. Of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere ( i.e World two. Drivers cab to suit that gritty-grainier look well ; I like it than...
Homes For Sale In Southaven, Ms By Owner,
The Devil's Rain Filming Locations,
Graphing And Analyzing Scientific Data Answer Key Pdf,
Wheatland Wyoming Murders,
Funny Nicknames For Kylee,
Articles F
