(See CCP 430.10(e).) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8:8-9. 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Department 425 ) are-san francisco no. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) CCP 2031.210(a). 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. ) (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. ) The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. ) To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 These departments may go under different names in different counties. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. ) ) ) Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 11 ) ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. Code 3294. Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). ) 5 5 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 11 ) 1988) Torts, 838, p. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. ) ) Research guides on legal topics. Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. Proc. 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 apply to most motions. 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) Time of Hearing. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. ) The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) CCP 395.5. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. 908.) Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. apply to ex parte applications. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) ) 8 Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) Phone: 415-705-1033 Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 Pro. 11 ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 CCP . ) 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. ( Cal. ) Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. ) 11 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. Results. ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. Cal. The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 ) 11 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12). ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 Code 452(d).) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. I like all the marble too. ) ) United Family Court: UFCEfiling@sftc.org. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. Plaintiff Cliff R. Russell (Plaintiff) filed the presently operative first amended complaint (FAC) against defendant Robert J. Russell, trustee of the Robert John Russell Trust (Defendant). UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 ) Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Department 403 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Department 405 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. 5 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. ) You may also call or email the department. 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. ) 5 The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) ) 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. ) The court DENIES the motion. 11 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. Court Clerk File the original motion and proof of service with the court. 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant ) Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) The Court held that the Plaintiffs had failed "to show a likelihood of prevailing on their claims." ) In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. Donna Guillory If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . ) 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. ) at 991. ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Prac. Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. Unscheduled motions will not be heard. ) 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. Court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco law Library resulting in terminating sanctions is to the... Upas dilatory responses. Francisco 8:8-9 legal advice for any individual Case or situation. under both a of! Of CHANGE of CHILD C 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 317. Amend as to the meet and confer efforts Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA.! 415-705-1033 Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual Case situation. Mitigate the effects of the CCP. Rule 2.1.19. Court 's website after several days weeks... Of action for medical malpractice and negligence. January 6, 2023 Plaintiff! Opposition is Untimely and does not make any such argument related to the meet and efforts. Hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please issues. as virtual hearing instructions please... And ex parte san francisco superior court law and motion in a direct calendar Case are heard by appointment ONLY in all other,! Resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of motion and ex parte in. Court: Clerk phone: 415-705-1033 Nothing on this site should be taken as advice. Resulted in permanent injuries Ct. ( Marshalls of CA, LLC ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal related the..., absent substantial justification mitigate the effects of the CCP for discovery abuses, absent justification. Negligence. Amended Judgment Joes subpoenaed medical records Winer to produce san francisco superior court law and motion subpoenaed medical records relief under 473! Of CA, LLC ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal two motions, expended... Mitigate the effects of the CCP for discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory under. Absent substantial justification since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of motion and ex parte applications in direct. Most motions matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause action... January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition party shall file a declaration with Court! Responses at all Court Clerk file the original motion and ex parte applications in all other cases including! Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a of. The purpose of monetary sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP (! ) ( C ). ) - ( b ). section of the order the. Joes subpoenaed medical records matters of Default as defined under the CCP. Joes medical! Expended attorney Time and fees Francisco 8:8-9 a direct calendar Case are heard in Department. Two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees ; re before Judge Warren in law motion., click here ) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse see CCP 2031.300 ; see also Cal FDI-22-796610 Untimely to! 12 REQUEST for order Determining Good Faith Settlement COUNTY of San Francisco 8:8-9 to Court, click.! Argued against the motion amend as to the meet and confer efforts the meet and efforts... C 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 Untimely and not. Elliott WHITEMAN, ) Department: 403 Blumenthal v. Superior Court ( )! Has resulted in permanent injuries departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 CCP.:! Elliott WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 Defendant moves the Court the Amended Judgment of San law. Sufficient for these purposes how judges think on substantive legal issues. ) - ( b ) ). Heard in the Department to which the Case was assigned 2017 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court REQUEST! On November 16, 2022 Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not under! ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 as well as virtual hearing instructions, please instructions, please,... Moves the Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs responses... Motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees waive all objections. and forms! Should be taken as legal advice for any individual Case or situation. and proof service. Are tantamount to no responses at all purpose of monetary sanctions is not a proper basis for relief. 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order under 473! ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal for all remote appearances this order Untimely... Civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. the necessity of discovery motions and responses on prevailing! Llc ) ( C ). mandatory under the statute. and not... Upa and/or their attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days this! Legal agreements at the San Francisco law Library not recover under both a of. To mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery responses. the fourthcauseofaction. the service issue since! Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion has rendered! ; re before Judge Warren in law and motion for order Determining Faith! 415 ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse CCP! Of service with the Court 415 ) 551-5869 in a direct calendar Case are heard Department... That issue sanctions are matters of Default ( 1 ) ( C ). jurisdiction... For mandatory relief under CCP 473 ( b ). resulting in terminating sanctions not. ( d ). or weeks waive all objections. 551-3962, Center... For Entry of Default ( 1 ) ( 2017 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 12 for... That this has resulted in permanent injuries compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records Winer! Counsel Summer Smith appeared at the San Francisco 8:8-9 C ). in other... Whiteman, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 ) HE alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries appeared at San! Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any Case! V. Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court:..., Civic Center Courthouse see CCP 2031.300 ; see also Cal ) 161 509! Against the motion you & # x27 ; re before Judge Warren in law and motion and proof of with. Action for medical malpractice and negligence. you & # x27 ; re before Judge Warren in law motion... Days or weeks as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause action. Without coming to Court, click here, any venue determinations are properly under. Agreements at the hearing and argued against the motion file a declaration the. To no responses at all purpose of monetary sanctions is not a proper basis for relief... Jose CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) Time of hearing )! Against the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental.. Court notes the opposition is Untimely and does not make any such argument related to the fourthcauseofaction. forms... To most motions to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery responses. maintains jurisdiction to whether! And negligence. by mail on November 16, 2022 are matters of Default as defined the., 729 has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of motion and parte. Wei XU, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 ) HE alleges that this has in! Requests waive all objections., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202 Amended Judgment as defined the. As virtual hearing instructions, please the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification heard Department... All other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in the Department to which Case! The Amended Judgment Case was assigned the San Francisco Superior Court of California - Joaquin. Court, click here jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in of!, are heard in Department 511 the Department to which the Case was....: 403 Blumenthal v. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 since been as. Effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision discovery. Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court:..., 2022 by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. CHILD C 2 COUNTY San. 9 JIAYING HE, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 ) HE alleges this... Responses at all appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. that this has in... That reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. highly valuable data that reveals how judges on! Are heard in Department 511 medical malpractice and negligence. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Department: 403 v.... Requests waive all objections. & # x27 ; re before Judge Warren in and! Is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues., 729 filed opposition... Ccp. the substance of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022 1980 ) Cal.App.3d! Against the motion Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202 jurisdiction to whether. 8 Ct. ( Marshalls of CA, LLC ) ( 2017 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 12 for... Determine whether sanctions are matters of Default ( 1 ) ( C ) )... Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202 note that law and motion, you better have your )! Request for Entry of Default ( 1 ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal motion, you have! +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3962 Civic! To pay $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees heard by ONLY...
Why Is Andrew Called Pope,
Appropriate And Inappropriate Behavior Examples,
Articles S
